Paradoxes of the Right to Life in the Philosophy of Personal Rights

Sadovo-Rumyantsev V.Y.

In connection with the entry into force of the new edition of the nomenclature of scientific specialties, the journal is included in the List of peer-reviewed scientific publications in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of Candidate of Sciences, for the degree of Doctor of Sciences, in the following scientific specialties should be published: 5.6.1. National history (historical sciences); 5.6.2. General history (historical sciences); 5.6.5. Historiography, source studies and methods of historical research (historical sciences); 5.7.7. Social and political philosophy (philosophical sciences); 5.7.8. Philosophical anthropology, philosophy of culture (philosophical sciences); 5.7.9. Philosophy of religion and religious studies (philosophical sciences); 5.9.5. Russian language. Languages of the peoples of Russia; 5.9.8. Theoretical, Applied and Comparative Linguistics (Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated February 1, 2022 No. 33-r).

Paradoxes of the Right to Life in the Philosophy of Personal Rights

Sadovo-Rumyantsev V.Y.

(Armavir)

The basic idea is that a person has the right both to life and death. With access to mass death occurs paradoxes. The article deals with these paradoxes, and shows the need for a ?exible approach to solving the problems of life and death. It’s considered that personal rights – are the rights to his body and soul in their unity. New aspects of the paradox of the human right to suicide, which deprives a person of life, and with the right to life are revealed. The conclusion is that euthanasia can be considered as a right to a painless death, which is not identical to the right to suicide.

Keywords

personal rights, the right to life, right to death, suicide, euthanasia

Full text of any article (in Russian) you can find
in the printed version of the journal or on RSCI website.