If the Hypothesis about Welby’s Infl uence Ch. Pierce’s Semiotics Is Valid

N.I. Steshenko

In connection with the entry into force of the new edition of the nomenclature of scientific specialties, the journal is included in the List of peer-reviewed scientific publications in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of Candidate of Sciences, for the degree of Doctor of Sciences, in the following scientific specialties should be published: 5.6.1. National history (historical sciences); 5.6.2. General history (historical sciences); 5.6.5. Historiography, source studies and methods of historical research (historical sciences); 5.7.7. Social and political philosophy (philosophical sciences); 5.7.8. Philosophical anthropology, philosophy of culture (philosophical sciences); 5.7.9. Philosophy of religion and religious studies (philosophical sciences); 5.9.5. Russian language. Languages of the peoples of Russia; 5.9.8. Theoretical, Applied and Comparative Linguistics (Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated February 1, 2022 No. 33-r).

If the Hypothesis about Welby’s Infl uence Ch. Pierce’s Semiotics Is Valid

N.I. Steshenko

(Southern Federal University)

My main objection direction is against the conclusion of the article “V. Welby’s Signifi cs and Semiotics Ch. Peirce’s:
Problems of Sign and Meaning” by V.V. Lyashov and K.D. Skripnik. These conclusions are: 1) V. Welby’s Signifi ca infl uenced Ch. Pierce and Ch. Morris; 2) Significa is a new starting point for the sign systems study. My article shows that the first conclusion has no textual justification. The second conclusion is highly doubtful, since V. Welby’s signifi cation is very poorly developed conceptually.

Keywords

Ch. Peirce, V. Welby, Ch. Morris, significs, semiotics

Full text of any article (in Russian) you can find
in the printed version of the journal or on RSCI website.